Evidence against global warming mounts

Just as we emerge from one of the longer and colder winters in recent memory, and evidence against Al Gore’s global warming Chicken Little-ism continues to build, it appears the Bush Administration may be buckling to the pressure, just as the pressure valve is set to release.

Wearing roller shades of his eyes, if Bush enacts a global warming agenda, it would mark a severe course correction; he was the one who reversed course from the Clinton-Gore Administration, who commited the US to the Kyoto Accords just prior to leaving office, and when Bush took over, he pulled the US out of the ecomony-destroying climate treaty.

Contrary evidence is piling up every day. Vast evidence now supports the idea that global temps peaked around 1998, have held steady since, and actually dropped about a full degree this past year, meaning that the full century’s worth of creep Gore tried to claim was destroying the plant was wiped out by one cold winter.

Sunspot activity is deemed the most likely cause of global temperature changes by most traditional scientists, including the Dr. Fred Singer and Dennis T. Avery, who wrote “Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years,” and not as a result of human activity, as Algore and his zittoheads allege.

Minnesota and the upper midwest have been hit my mid-April blizzards and freezing temps, with gardening and crop-growing season starting later than it has in many years. Of course, for the zittoheads out there, there is no such thing as contrary evidence… even the coldest year on record in decades is “further proof of global warming” to those mind-numbed robots.

9 thoughts on “Evidence against global warming mounts”

  1. I’m in middle school and I go to a very liberal school and I’m a conservative. We’re having a debate in our science class and these articles help to argue against them. Thanks

  2. Mika,

    Glad you find this useful. Global warming’s a pet peeve of mine and the fact that there’s so much contradictory evidence out there that is being ignored or supressed simply proves Gore’s agenda is one of politics, not of science.

    Craig

  3. Rob,

    With respect, those who believe in global warming (referred to on this site as Algore zittoheads) believe that anyone who is a scientist who debunks global warming is “in the pocket of big oil,” so that critique holds little credibility with me. Over the history of my blog coverage on this issue, I’ve cited the work of scientists as far-flung as Russia and India, not just Dennis Avery.

    And as for your statement that there is a warming trend and it cannot be challenged, you fall short on that, also. The most recent non-zittohead studies indicate that, in fact, the last five years has seen a global cooling trend, if anything, and has completely wiped out the warming cycle Algore goes all Chicken Little over.

    There are minor warming and cooling trends throughout history. The last panic was over “the coming global ice age” in the 1970s, and the exact same supposed causes were cited as the culprits then, so pardon my skepticism, but I believe it’s warranted.

    The biggest source of global warming is all the hot air generated by Algore and his zittohead followers spewing off at the mouth constantly, in the face of growing contradictory, and diminishing supportive, scientific evidence.

    Oh, and that study that firmly establishes a series of cyclical warming and cooling cycles over the centuries? That was a product of none other than a Harvard University study – hardly a bastion of conservative thought.

  4. hello everyone,
    ok, here’s the deal, i’m 13, and Aaron Algore DID NOT make the internet…..seriously he was probably in some committee that knew about the project and he went and took credit for it all…then again some doof has to right?…..another thing….gobal warming is a hoax! bye!

  5. Hi everyone, my class is doing a project on Global warming and what we can do to stop this from happening ( since it’s obviously our fault)… I want to do my project on all the facts disclaiming global warming, as I think it is a load of b.s. to think that we could change the climate. We have to use measurable, identifiable and available sources of data, and of course I want the facts to be legit, and convincing. If anyone cold help me compile a good set of data to present to those suckers I would really appreciate it. It seems like there is a lot of evidence against it but I need to pick and choose the most prominent and substantial. Ideas? Links? Thanks.

  6. Taylor,

    You’ve been misled and misinformed by Algore’s misleading propaganda. For a more rational look at global climate change, read “Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years,” by Dr. Fred Singer and Dennis T. Avery, as well as “Climate of Extremes: Global Warming Science They Don’t Want You to Know” By Patrick J. Michaels and Robert C. Balling, Jr. If you prefer video over reading, try The Great Global Warming Swindle from the BBC.

    From a scientific perspective, all this material is far more solid than emotion-based faked photos of polar bears on ice… Sorry.

  7. Man-made global warming is a farce. My favorite question to the global warming lemmings is: “What is the number one factor that influences the weather?” Usually, after responses such as “carbon dioxide” – which is about 12th on the list – or blank looks, I point them to that orange orb in the sky; yes, the Sun.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge