<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WonderfulPessimist.com &#187; Election 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/category/election-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com</link>
	<description>No one has ever been fondly remembered for being a wonderful pessimist. -Ronald Reagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:02:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Iran threatening impending defeat of Israel, US</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2012/02/05/iran-threatening-impending-defeat-of-israel-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2012/02/05/iran-threatening-impending-defeat-of-israel-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomenei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayatollah Seyed Ali Hoseyni Khamenei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cd replication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iran&#8217;s supreme leader, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Hoseyni Khamenei, is putting the world on alert: Israel and the West will soon be defeated. That&#8217;s about as direct a declaration of war as it can get, prior to a direct strike, and yet the Obama Administration refuses to take the threat serious. Obama once dismissed Iran as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iran&#8217;s supreme leader, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Hoseyni Khamenei, is putting the world on alert: Israel and the West will soon be defeated. That&#8217;s about as direct a declaration of war as it can get, prior to a direct strike, and yet the Obama Administration refuses to take the threat serious. Obama once dismissed Iran as a threat, calling it a &#8220;little country&#8221; like the foreign policy tyro he is.</p>
<p>It would be almost fitting it Obama&#8217;s first term lived under the threat of terrorist actions from Iran; it would cement the final piece in the puzzle that patterns his failed presidency after Jimmy Carter&#8217;s.</p>
<p>“In light of the realization of the divine promise by almighty God, the Zionists and the Great Satan (America) will soon be defeated,” Khamenei said recently. Although similarly named, he is not to be confused with Carter Administration nemesis, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomenei, who died in 1989. Khamenei was his successor.</p>
<p>One doesn&#8217;t hear from Khamenei often as he frequently prefers to speak through Iranian President Achmadinijad, who faithfully delivers such death-threats against the West. With the raising of his profile, one has to wonder if a future attack is imminent.</p>
<p>Unless you&#8217;re US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in which case you just throw up your hands and say, fatalistically, &#8220;You can&#8217;t overthrow them all.&#8221; Great attitude, St. Hillary! Next you&#8217;ll declare <a href="http://www.disc2day.com/">cd replication</a> a bigger threat to western society than a nuclear Iran. Nice job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2012/02/05/iran-threatening-impending-defeat-of-israel-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney wins in Mormon country (of course)</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2012/02/04/romney-wins-in-mormon-country-of-course/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2012/02/04/romney-wins-in-mormon-country-of-course/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 07:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tap and die]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney did exceptionally well in the Nevada caucuses this weekend, as he was expected to do, but also did surprisingly well among the state&#8217;s conservatives, capturing half of that voting block, more than twice the amount who supported Newt Gingrich. Of course, next to Utah, Nevada boasts one of the most robust Mormon populations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney did exceptionally well in the Nevada caucuses this weekend, as he was expected to do, but also did surprisingly well among the state&#8217;s conservatives, capturing half of that voting block, more than twice the amount who supported Newt Gingrich.</p>
<p>Of course, next to Utah, Nevada boasts one of the most robust Mormon populations in America, so the victory should not come as a surprise. Romney is Mormon.</p>
<p>That said, if Romney ends up owing his victory to western-state conservatives and Mormons, it may bode well for a potential Romney presidency, pulling him to campaign and govern more to the right than he was able to as governor of Massachusetts. And that would be a good thing.</p>
<p>Only five states have spoken so far, and there are no signs that Gingrich, Ron Paul, or Rick Santorum plan to drop out any time soon. However, that&#8217;s healthy for the process; politics is not pro wrestling and does down operate under <a href="http://www.reidsupply.com/products/metalworking/cutting-tools/taps-dies/">tap and die</a> rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2012/02/04/romney-wins-in-mormon-country-of-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney now the eventual nominee</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2012/01/10/romney-now-the-eventual-nominee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2012/01/10/romney-now-the-eventual-nominee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Macys coupons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve never been a huge fan of former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. Why? Because although he has at times looked more conservative than other leading candidates, look who he was up against in the past: John McCain, Rudy Guiliani, Jon Huntsman, Mike Huckabee, and more. Against folks like that, even Barak Obama would seem like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never been a huge fan of former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>Why? Because although he has at times looked more conservative than other leading candidates, look who he was up against in the past: John McCain, Rudy Guiliani, Jon Huntsman, Mike Huckabee, and more. Against folks like that, even Barak Obama would seem like the more conservative choice.</p>
<p>The trouble is, when you contrast him against a real conservative like Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Bobby Jindal, Scott Walker, Paul Ryan, and more, he just doesn&#8217;t measure up.</p>
<p>But the people who decided to sit out are out, and the people who decided to run are running, and with Mitt Romney looking like he&#8217;ll win New Hampshire in a landslide, and leading in South Carolina, well&#8230; I hope for some upsets to extend the media attention on conservative solutions, but it&#8217;s pretty clear the Romney train is gonna run on time.</p>
<p>Newt Gingrich has been exposed for his limitations, the best candidate of them all &#8211; Herman Cain &#8211; has been driven out of the race, Rick Santorum has only been a Senator, Ron Paul is both insane and a liberal on foreign policy and <a href="http://www.dropdowndeals.com/macy%27s-coupons">2012 Macys coupons</a> have more value in a general election, and Rick Perry simply isn&#8217;t ready. No one else is viable.</p>
<p>So now comes the time where I&#8217;m gonna stop wishing for a late entry by Sarah Palin or some other dream candidate and get real: Mitt Romney&#8217;s not a perfect conservative, but so long as he doesn&#8217;t run to the left for the general election, there are things I can appreciate about him.</p>
<p>First, he&#8217;s been a governor. Second, he&#8217;s spent a good portion of his career in the private sector. And third, he&#8217;s not Barak Obama.</p>
<p>Okay. I think it&#8217;ll be an improvement. Now if only we can see him choose a genuine conservative as a running mate, rather than a RINO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2012/01/10/romney-now-the-eventual-nominee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon reluctantly cuts top tax rates</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/12/30/oregon-reluctantly-cuts-top-tax-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/12/30/oregon-reluctantly-cuts-top-tax-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 21:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best weight loss pill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 1, the top income earners in Oregon will be getting a tax cut&#8230; kinda. But that&#8217;s only if you don&#8217;t pay attention to what the tax rate was before the &#8220;temporary&#8221; hike. Even the best weight loss pill obtains better results than this. But here&#8217;s the details. Back in 2009, before Measure 66 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 1, the top income earners in Oregon will be getting a tax cut&#8230; kinda. But that&#8217;s only if you don&#8217;t pay attention to what the tax rate was before the &#8220;temporary&#8221; hike. Even the <a href="http://consumerbestdeals.com">best weight loss pill</a> obtains better results than this.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the details.</p>
<p>Back in 2009, before Measure 66 took effect, the top individual income tax rate in Oregon was an already-hefty nine percent. Measure 66 allowed a &#8220;temporary&#8221; rate hike to 10.8 and eleven percent on individuals with incomes over $125,000, and married couples filing jointly with incomes over $250,000.</p>
<p>Occupy Portland would call those families &#8220;the top 1 percent.&#8221;</p>
<p>People who know better call them, &#8220;small business owners&#8221; and &#8220;employers.&#8221;</p>
<p>On January first, that &#8220;temporary&#8221; tax rate hike gets rolled back&#8230; to 9.9 percent. That&#8217;s still nearly a full percent higher than the original top marginal rate of nine percent. So, in essence, Oregon&#8217;s top income earners aren&#8217;t getting a tax cut, so much as a reduction in the amount of the tax hike enacted upon them under Measure 66.</p>
<p>Already, Salem politicians are scheming to invent ways to get those 10.8 and 11 percent rates back, failing to acknowledge that 9.9 is still more than the original rate.</p>
<p>Yet this punitive tax-rate attack on employers and job creators comes at a poor moment. The unemployment rate (as currently calculated) has dropped to 9.1 percent, the lowest rate since the Obama Administration came to power, but that rate fails to take into account those workers who have been out of work so long, they no longer qualify for unemployment benefits, or who have given up looking for jobs entirely because there are so few to be found.</p>
<p>According to some sources, the &#8220;actual&#8221; unemployment rate could be as high as 14 percent or more, and even higher among recent college graduates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/12/30/oregon-reluctantly-cuts-top-tax-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pre-caucus poll: Gingrich by 4 points</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/12/18/pre-caucus-poll-gingrich-by-4-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/12/18/pre-caucus-poll-gingrich-by-4-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He divorced a dying wife, has cheated on more than one spouse, has engaged in &#8220;strange bedfellows&#8221; relations with every prominent Democrat on Capitol Hill, and is a definitive flip-flopper on most issues. Yet Newt Gingrich is becoming the teflon candidate of the Iowa caucuses. Following flirtations with Michelle Bachmann, Rick Perry and Herman Cain, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He divorced a dying wife, has cheated on more than one spouse, has engaged in &#8220;strange bedfellows&#8221; relations with every prominent Democrat on Capitol Hill, and is a definitive flip-flopper on most issues. Yet Newt Gingrich is becoming the teflon candidate of the Iowa caucuses.</p>
<p>Following flirtations with Michelle Bachmann, Rick Perry and Herman Cain, the anti-Romney forces of the Iowa GOP have latched onto Newt Gingrich and refuse to be thrown off. The most recent Gallup Poll has him up by four percent over Romney, who can&#8217;t break past a 25-percent ceiling in his support.</p>
<p>Rick Santorum is looking better and better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/12/18/pre-caucus-poll-gingrich-by-4-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now GOP racist for supporting a black candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/30/now-gop-racist-for-supporting-a-black-candidate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/30/now-gop-racist-for-supporting-a-black-candidate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, Democrats are like collection agencies; they never really leave you alone, ever. For ages, Democrats claimed the GOP was racist for being &#8220;too white.&#8221; Then they were racist for not supporting their own black candidates like the moderate General Colin Powell. And now that an genuine conservative black candidate is emerging in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Democrats are like <a href="http://www.kgaction.com/">collection agencies</a>; they never really leave you alone, ever.</p>
<p>For ages, Democrats claimed the GOP was racist for being &#8220;too white.&#8221; Then they were racist for not supporting their own black candidates like the moderate General Colin Powell. And now that an genuine conservative black candidate is emerging in the form of Herman Cain, who is the apparent front runner in most areas nationwide for the GOP presidential nomination,  have Dems backed off their racism claims against the GOP?</p>
<p>Perish the thought.</p>
<p>Now, we&#8217;re racist because we do support a black candidate for president.</p>
<p>Dem strategist Karen Finney blathered on like so recently on MSNBC:</p>
<blockquote><p>One of the things about Herman Cain is, I think that he makes that white Republican base of the party feel okay, feel like they are not racist because they can like this guy. I think he giving that base a free pass. And I think they like him because they think he&#8217;s a black man who knows his place. I know that&#8217;s harsh, but that&#8217;s how it sure seems to me.</p></blockquote>
<p>She&#8217;s joined in similar sentiment by Democratic Maryland Congressman Elijah Cummings, who uttered this hate-speech recently:</p>
<blockquote><p>I think when [members of the Tea Party] can vote for a Herman Cain and hear him say the things that he says they feel like, ‘Well, you know, I can, I support this guy and&#8230;so it shows that I’m not racist and I’m supportive.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow&#8230; and here I thought Herman Cain was garnering support because of his specific policy solutions, such as his 9-9-9 plan on simplifying the tax code as a first step toward a Fair Tax system. Or that he&#8217;s a red-blooded conservative with solid ideas on what he&#8217;s do if elected to change the course of this country&#8217;s economy. Or maybe even that he is a guy who&#8217;s well-qualified for his leadership in the private sector as well as the public sector, even though he&#8217;s never run for elective office and can therefore run as a Washington outsider ready to reform government.</p>
<p>Nah, none of that counts. It&#8217;s just our racism again. I should have known. Thanks, liberals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/30/now-gop-racist-for-supporting-a-black-candidate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cain is able</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/21/cain-is-able/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/21/cain-is-able/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the Western GOP Debate earlier this week, the verdict is in: Herman Cain is no flash-in-the-pan candidate, but has won a second straight presidential preference straw poll, this time in Nevada. Cain garnered 31 percent of those polls, compared to 29 percent for Mitt Romney and 20 percent for Newt Gingrich. Perry, who drew [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the Western GOP Debate earlier this week, the verdict is in: Herman Cain is no flash-in-the-pan candidate, but has won a second straight presidential preference straw poll, this time in Nevada. Cain garnered 31 percent of those polls, compared to 29 percent for Mitt Romney and 20 percent for Newt Gingrich.</p>
<p>Perry, who drew frequent boos from the Las Vegas audience earlier this week, managed only 4 percent. Even Ron Paul won 10 percent there.</p>
<p>The debate victory, which most observers gave to Cain or Romney, was reflected in the poll results. As Perry continues to struggle, and Gingrich is far less popular nationwide than the Nevada result indicates, it appears that the conservative and Tea Party factions have finally found a candidate they can agree on; Cain is appearing to solidify himself as the &#8220;anyone but Romney&#8221; candidate.</p>
<p>Will that be enough to  win the nomination? That depends on who supporters of former conservative and Tea Party darlings like Rick Santorum and Michele Bachmann, migrate to after those candidates drop out of the race. Cain would seem the most natural choice.</p>
<p>Can Cain beat Obama? You know what? I bet a Cuban <a href="http://www.famous-smoke.com/">cigar</a> he can. I think he&#8217;s the candidate Obama is least eager to face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/21/cain-is-able/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schultz reveals racism of the left</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/14/schultz-reveals-racism-of-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/14/schultz-reveals-racism-of-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Schultz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed Schultz, host of MSNBC&#8217;s &#8220;The Ed Show,&#8221; has revealed the virulent racist streak that runs through liberalism but is rarely talked about or criticized by the appropriate groups, purely because racists like Schultz hold the &#8220;proper&#8221; political views in the eyes of the Rainbow Coalition, the NAACP, and other liberal special interest groups. On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Schultz, host of MSNBC&#8217;s &#8220;The Ed Show,&#8221; has revealed the virulent racist streak that runs through liberalism but is rarely talked about or criticized by the appropriate groups, purely because racists like Schultz hold the &#8220;proper&#8221; political views in the eyes of the Rainbow Coalition, the NAACP, and other liberal special interest groups.</p>
<p>On recent broadcasts, Schultz has bloviated about how black Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain is pandering to &#8220;white Republicans out there who don&#8217;t like black folks.&#8221; That would be quite a trick, if that were even possible.</p>
<p>Schultz&#8217; comment exposes the left&#8217;s overconfidence in their foothold among black voters. Even with the nation&#8217;s first black president in the White House, Schultz apparently believes it&#8217;s okay to play the race card and accuse a party that currently favors Cain over Mitt Romney, of racism.</p>
<p>If the GOP actually were as racist as Schultz suggests, Cain would&#8217;t be surging right now, regardless of the fact that he has presented what is consistently the most solid and conservative political message of any candidate running.</p>
<p>Schultz also railed against Senator Jim DeMint, whom Cain has mentioned as a potential running mate if he wins the nomination. Yet those comments aren&#8217;t even worth wasting virtual space on. Maybe Schultz simply needs to be sent a bunch of <a href="http://www.invitationbox.com/christmascards.html">Christmas Cards</a> to cheer him up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/14/schultz-reveals-racism-of-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double-minded libs exposed on Hank Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/04/double-minded-libs-exposed-on-hank-jr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/04/double-minded-libs-exposed-on-hank-jr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Williams Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama-Hitler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so this is the thing making the wires hum right now. While appearing on Fox News, country-singer Hank Williams Jr. compared Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner&#8217;s &#8220;bipartisan golf outing&#8221; with President Barak Obama as a huge mistake. Here, specifically, is what he said: &#8220;It&#8217;s like Hitler playing golf with [Israeli Prime Minister [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so this is the thing making the wires hum right now.</p>
<p>While appearing on Fox News, country-singer Hank Williams Jr. compared Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner&#8217;s &#8220;bipartisan golf outing&#8221; with President Barak Obama as a huge mistake. Here, specifically, is what he said:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s like Hitler playing golf with [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu,&#8221; the country singer said of the bipartisan golf game.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s it. An offensive image? Sure. But an analogy, not a direct comparison of Obama to Hitler, necessarily. It&#8217;s open to interpretation. Williams clarified himself later by issuing this in a statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Some of us have strong opinions and are often misunderstood. My analogy was extreme — but it was to make a point.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And that&#8217;s the extent of what he said.</p>
<p>For that, ESPN, owned by the libs at ABC/Disney, had pulled Williams&#8217; signature Monday Night Football theme, &#8220;Are You Ready For Some Football?,&#8221; based on his country hit, &#8220;All My Rowdy Friends Are Coming Over Tonight,&#8221; from Monday&#8217;s football broadcast. And if it weren&#8217;t for public outcry, he&#8217;d have already had the theme permanently removed &#8230; which ABC/Disney/ESPN hasn&#8217;t ruled out just yet. They&#8217;re just testing the waters to see if they can get away with it.</p>
<p>Williams Jr.&#8217;s theme was first released in 1984 and adopted as the Monday Night Football theme song in the late 1980s. So it&#8217;s been the theme of the show for close to a quarter-century, and only the second theme in the show&#8217;s history, save for a brief period in the 1990s when ABC experimented with having artists other than Hank Williams Jr. cover the song, including Amy Grant, of all people! I can&#8217;t find the list anymore.</p>
<p>Anyway, whatever happened to freedom of speech? Or at least being consistent about what&#8217;s off-limits?</p>
<p>Because Democrats are comparing Republican politicians to Hitler. All the time. And they never get called on it. Not like this.</p>
<p>Doubt me? Here&#8217;s a video where <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0Roco3lilA">Wisconsin Republican Governor Scott Walker</a> is compared to Hitler because of his budget proposal that included limiting collective bargain rights for public employees paid by the taxpayer.</p>
<p>And when Republican President George W. Bush was in office, if you listened to liberals, you would have thought his middle name was Hitler. Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://semiskimmed.net/bushhitler.html">not-even-close-to-comprehensive list</a> that does offer close to 75 celebrities, politicians and other organizations who have compared Bush to Germany&#8217;s WWII dictator.</p>
<p>Republican New Jersey Governor <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/57164.html">Chris Christie</a> has also been compared to the mastermind of the Jewish Holocaust. For cutting taxes.</p>
<p>The list is much, much longer. Basically, if you&#8217;re a Republican, there&#8217;s a Democrat waiting in the wings to compare you to Hitler.</p>
<p>But none of them lose their jobs over it. Real consistent there, libs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/10/04/double-minded-libs-exposed-on-hank-jr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann lead in South Carolina</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/08/30/rick-perry-michele-bachmann-lead-in-south-carolina/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/08/30/rick-perry-michele-bachmann-lead-in-south-carolina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geneticist jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Huntsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas Governor Rick Perry and Minnesota congresswoman Michele Bachmann lead the pack currently in South Carolina, which should be a relief to conservatives and Tea Party activists nationwide. The rest of the pack might fare better seeking geneticist jobs, despite the liberal media trying to puff up the chances of the RINO-esque Mitt Romney and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Governor Rick Perry and Minnesota congresswoman Michele Bachmann lead the pack currently in South Carolina, which should be a relief to conservatives and Tea Party activists nationwide. The rest of the pack might fare better seeking <a href="http://www.healthcarejobsite.com/jobsearch/healthcare/physicians-surgeons/default.asp?job=geneticist">geneticist jobs</a>, despite the liberal media trying to puff up the chances of the RINO-esque Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman in the state.</p>
<p>South Carolina, the fourth state to vote, looks set to be a pivotal state once again. A Perry-Bachmann or Perry-Cain ticket would certainly be intriguing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/08/30/rick-perry-michele-bachmann-lead-in-south-carolina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walker vindicated as recall effort falls short</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/08/12/walker-vindicated-as-recall-effort-falls-short/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/08/12/walker-vindicated-as-recall-effort-falls-short/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[receipt printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Harsdorf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelley Moore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite gaining two seats in the Wisconsin State Senate, Democrats fell short of their efforts to overturn the results of the 2010 election that placed Republican Scott Walker at the head of the purple-ish state. Any receipt printer would pop out the same results: that Walker&#8217;s reforms have saved jobs and his state&#8217;s budget from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite gaining two seats in the Wisconsin State Senate, Democrats fell short of their efforts to overturn the results of the 2010 election that placed Republican Scott Walker at the head of the purple-ish state. Any <a href="http://www.posmicro.com/RECPRINTERS/ReceiptPrinters.htm">receipt printer</a> would pop out the same results: that Walker&#8217;s reforms have saved jobs and his state&#8217;s budget from cutting back on the state workforce.</p>
<p>Of course, irate teachers like Shelley Moore, who lost in a landslide favoring incumbent Republican Sheila Harsdorf, simply don&#8217;t understand that lines like, &#8220;we breathe union&#8221; turns voters off, as does demanding no change in their quality of life, salary and benefits when the taxpayers footing the bill for it are suffering from high unemployment and the worst economy in eighty years.</p>
<p>Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is one of the few Republicans serious about making real, difference-making cuts to spending, and an example for every GOP presidential hopeful to take note of going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/08/12/walker-vindicated-as-recall-effort-falls-short/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standard and Poor&#8217;s now &#8220;an arm of the GOP?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/08/12/standard-and-poors-now-an-arm-of-the-gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/08/12/standard-and-poors-now-an-arm-of-the-gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golf gps watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poor's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US credit rating]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/?p=907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After slapping the US with the first downgrade of the US&#8217;s credit rating in several decades, Standard and Poor&#8217;s is now being treated by the White House as an enemy, and an arm of the GOP. But it doesn&#8217;t take a golf gps watch to figure out why the credit downgrade was enacted. Taking a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After slapping the US with the first downgrade of the US&#8217;s credit rating in several decades, Standard and Poor&#8217;s is now being treated by the White House as an enemy, and an arm of the GOP. But it doesn&#8217;t take a <a href="http://www.thesource.ca/estore/product.aspx?language=en-CA&#038;catalog=Online&#038;category=portable-gps&#038;product=7203014">golf gps watch</a> to figure out why the credit downgrade was enacted.</p>
<p>Taking a bunch of zeros out of the mix, the situation is equivalent to this: the US government is like a family making, say, around $21,000. They have a debt of close to, say, $250,000 to $500,000. And the recent budget cuts are like that family decided to spend about $450 less next year. See how pointless the measly cuts agreed to are yet?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why Standard and Poor&#8217;s downgraded the US credit rating, and even in that they were generous. And real family operating like this would have been downgraded long ago, and given a far worse downgrade to boot.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to stop joking around with budget cuts, whining when a &#8220;projected increase&#8221; is mildly reduced, but is still an increase. It&#8217;s time for real budget cuts, before our national credit rating erodes even further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonderfulpessimist.com/2011/08/12/standard-and-poors-now-an-arm-of-the-gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

